The Power of Data Visualization: Unpacking Election Maps

====================================================

In recent US elections, election maps have become a hotly debated topic among analysts and citizens alike. These visualizations aim to provide insight into voting patterns across states by color-coding areas based on their overall electoral or popular vote results. However, the choice of map design can significantly influence how we perceive these outcomes.

A Case Study: The NY Times Election Map Controversy

---------------------------------------------

The 2008 US presidential election saw a contentious debate over an interactive county-level map published by The New York Times (NYT). The map's creator, Robert J. Vanderbei from Princeton University, initially designed it to counter the narrative that states were either solidly 'red' or 'blue.' His goal was to highlight more nuanced voting patterns within these supposedly uniform areas.

However, some critics argued that this approach actually obscured key information about the election results by downplaying significant differences between certain counties. In response to feedback from readers like Jeff Mager (spelling corrected), Vanderbei eventually released an alternative version of his map using a different color palette:

Original vs. Revised Map: Which is More Informative?

------------------------------------------------

The original Purple America map employed shades ranging from light blue at 70% Democratic to deep purple for areas voting above 60% Republican. Critics argued that this scheme made it difficult to distinguish between counties with relatively small margins (e.g., within a few percentage points) and those where one candidate had achieved landslide victories.

In contrast, the revised map uses different shades of red, orange, and blue depending on how far each county deviated from state-level election results. For example:

- Counties voting more Democratic than their respective states are shown in increasingly deep shades of blue.

- Conversely, counties voting more Republican receive correspondingly darker shades of red.

The benefits of this approach lie not only in providing a clearer picture of local voting patterns but also in facilitating comparisons across different elections by allowing users to easily identify areas that have shifted or remained loyal to particular candidates over time.

-------

Election maps can serve as powerful tools for understanding how voters cast their ballots at both the national and state levels. However, it is essential to critically evaluate these visualizations against specific goals and audiences in mind while also considering potential biases introduced through design choices such as color schemes or geographical boundaries used for mapping purposes.

Ultimately, by encouraging open dialogue about data visualization methods employed during elections and beyond, we can create more informed citizens who are better equipped to interpret complex information presented before them.

Nytime election map